Mad Bears Club
  • News
  • Research
  • Analytics
  • Make post
  • Dashboard
Mad Bears Club
  • Make post
  • Dashboard
Mad Bears Club
  • News
  • Research
  • Analytics
  • Research

Multiple block chain and cross chain ecosystem

  • 11.08.2023
  • mr_sage

Most people mistakenly believe that the only risk associated with bridges is that of bridge hackers, however this is not the case.

If you own bridging assets, you run the risk of being diluted every second!

Because of this, Vitalik is apprehensive about cross-chain operations despite his hope for a multi-chain ecosystem. Fundamentally, it is safe to own native assets on their native chains (for example, Ether on Ethereum and Sol on Solana).

Because the protocol rules safeguard your assets and prevent thieves from stealing them, even in the improbable scenario of a 51% attack.

When they bridge, a problem occurs.For instance, once they have received the Wrapped Ether (WETH) on the target chain, an attacker can bridge Ethereum to another chain and undo the transaction on Ethereum.

Due to this, there will be an excess of WETH relative to the Eth in the bridge contract, diluting WETH.As a result, if you had WETH on the destination chain at the time of the event, you would lose money because WETH would now be worth less than Eth.Roll Ups, or Layer 2 solutions, are fortunately resistant to this issue because rolling back the Ethereum blockchain will also affect all Roll Ups that are built on Ethereum.

Therefore, it is secure to keep Layer 2 native assets on other Layer 2 solutions as well as Layer 2 native assets on Ethereum.The amount of assets currently held in bridges makes it unprofitable for anyone to undertake a 51% attack, Vitalik Buterin continued.

However, as more assets are connected, the incentives for such an assault grow.But in my opinion, it’s already problematic because these bridges rely on mint-wrapped assets rather than locked assets when you bridge, which makes them less secure.

Additionally, an attacker might perpetually repeat the operation with a tiny sum, like 100 ETH.

Currently, the obstacle is the high cost of 51% assaults.In conclusion, it is best to avoid connecting native assets to other chains, especially if you want to reduce your risk.

This supports both the integrity of blockchain technology and maintaining strong security practises.

Stay secure.

Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0
0
You May Also Like
View post
  • Research

Airdrops in crypto – how to analyze them?

  • iskingacid
  • 21.09.2023
View post
  • Research

3 of worst Blockchains

  • iskingacid
  • 20.09.2023
View post
  • Research

5 weirdest crypto tokens

  • iskingacid
  • 19.09.2023
View post
  • Research

Financial Risk Management

  • rogers2224
  • 17.09.2023
View post
  • Research

Investment Strategies For Different Life Stages

  • rogers2224
  • 16.09.2023
View post
  • Research

A Comprehensive Guide to Identifying Fraudulent NFT Projects

  • rogers2224
  • 15.09.2023
View post
  • Research

Crypto World:10 countries that highly depend on Bitcoin

  • iskingacid
  • 14.09.2023
View post
  • Research

Navigating FUD In Your Project: Strategies For Effective Management

  • Prime Vine
  • 12.09.2023
Our NFT collections
Our Web3 Education courses
Our Web3 alpha tools

Subscribe to our newsletter

Mad Bears Club
Web3 media
Follow us
Discord
Twitter
Telegram
iOS App

Input your search keywords and press Enter.